After the COVID-19 pandemic stopped many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are actually revivijersey soccer custom uberlube luxury lubricant yeezy shoes women personalized celtics jersey yeezy boost 350 v2 hyperspace bouncing putty egg adidas yeezy 700 v3 nike air max sale outlet yeezy sale wig store yeezy sale custom triathlon jersey adidas yeezy boost 350 turtle dove cheap jordan 4 custom dallas stars jersey ng these systems. Via lie recognition tools analyzed at the edge to a system for confirming documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of technologies is being included in asylum applications. This article explores just how these technology have reshaped the ways asylum procedures are conducted. That reveals how asylum seekers will be transformed into obligated hindered techno-users: They are asked to abide by a series of techno-bureaucratic steps and also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This obstructs their particular capacity to find their way these systems and to pursue their legal right for proper protection.
It also demonstrates how these technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They aid the ‚circuits of financial-humanitarianism‘ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers‘ socio-legal precarity by hindering all of them from opening the programs of safeguard. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be coupled with an insight in to the disciplinary mechanisms worth mentioning technologies, in which migrants are turned into data-generating subjects who all are self-disciplined by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal expertise, the article argues that these systems have an inherent obstructiveness. They have a double result: This Site even though they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also produce it difficult to get refugees to navigate these systems. They may be positioned in a ‚knowledge deficit‘ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions created by non-governmental celebrities, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes‘ which may result in inaccurate or discriminatory outcomes.